Monday, September 29, 2008

#180 - vs.


can i just say how much i love the fact that terminator and heroes are on the same night, and back-to-back? now let's just hope that everyone watches terminator and no one watches heroes so that those network executive people can see what kind of television is worth backing. tonight i watched a fantastic episode of terminator, no big robot fights, but a whole lot of robot backstory (actually "front"-story because it was a flash-forward to the future talking about the past of cameron's human-self... and they kept it all very understandable) and great acting too, i think. i just love this girl... it seems like all those joss whedon girls just have that right mix of toughness and cry-ability. and then after that i watched a horrible episode of heroes, full of generic "why are you really angry" scenes, over exposed super-powered people, and no likeable characters to be found anywhere!

i mean, c'mon, when no one dies and people can do whatever they want, then who cares what anyone does? it can just be undone, according to them. when people have no limits then what does it matter what anyone does? not so with terminator. the robots are flawed, the characters are flawed, they're not invincible and they don't have overwhelming power over everything around them. also, gotta love that terminator cares enough to develop and enhance backstory, rather than just creating outrageous twists and shoving them together with existing storylines through unseen plot devices. when you don't have integrity about your own show's mythology, that's when viewers (like me) feel disillusioned and kinda betrayed. if they're not true to the story they've built, then why should we watch?

in conclusion: good job to terminator, boo to heroes.

(ps - i KNEW that snotty albino bizz-nitch was a machine! ha!)

Thursday, September 25, 2008

#179 - whoa

yesterday on mythbusters they did a show on can a cable (pulled at high tension) cut someone clean in half if it snaps. it came about from those aircraft carriers that have cables to help airplanes slow down when they land:

so they tested whether or not they could split a person in half with a snapped cable (of course, they didn't use people, they used pigs, whole, dead, pigs... that was like half the fun). but alas, come rope, come 3/8ths inch cable, come 5/8ths inch cable at 30,000 lbs of tensions, the pig stayed intact, just with some nasty rope/cable burns. so, myth busted, although, just for kicks and giggles, they did get a forklift, wrap the cable around the pig and just pulled... y'know how potters use strings to cut through clay? it was as easy (and disgustingly awesome) as that.

i've always been very cautious about things that can kill me, i'm sure everyone is, but i think i'm a little more paranoid than the average person because my imagination can be very active, and when i envision possible scenarios i always think, "geez, how easy would it be to just have that happen?" like when i see people leaning on glass railings, i think, how simple would it be to just hop over that? or have it break? and that's unnerving because if i think, and imagine myself, say, hopping over a railing, how far from that is having my brain accidentally do it, right?

anyway, but the cable thing was busted... probably because the cable snap, although a very powerful force, is also very fleeting. and if mythbusters (and physics) have taught me anything, it's that enormous speed just isn't enough, you also need mass to create the kinds of forces that would press into and through the pig's skin. however, give yourself some kind of continuous force and something as simple as a jump rope can be deadly... geez, can you believe that? see? things like this are so easy to happen. i'm just amazed that they could put her hand back... but do you think the hand is evil now?

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

#178 - dollhouse


good job to brandi and joseph for bringing up one of my favorite subjects... tv shows i like. haha. and when talking about tv shows i like, you really only have to mention one name: joss whedon. i think i like just about anything and everything the guy did (except for the comic books, i stopped reading those and haven't looked back). everything from roseanne to buffy to angel to firefly (did you know he even co-wrote for toy story and aliens 4?). unfortunately, a lot of his ideas have been smashed by network production... well, i'm sure that's true for a lot of writers out there trying to balance making a living and sharing their vision. but, for example, the original buffy movie (with kristy swanson and luke perry) was completely messed with so that the end product was so far off what joss whedon wanted that he decided to create buffy the tv show (so i guess that was a good thing huh?). for another example, producers at the fox network switched around all the episodes of firefly and made such a total mess of that show that only 11 of the 14 episodes actually aired and the aired the pilot as the last episode on tv ever (which spurred joss whedon to create the movie serenity so i guess that a good thing too!).

so here's hoping they don't do the same thing to this new tv show "dollhouse." everything i can find on it says that it's gonna be about some people (including eliza dushku... hotness!) who have their memories and personalities stripped so that they can implanted with new memories and personalities and are then rented out to carry out various missions and such.

after the debacle of firefly, joss whedon swore he would never work with fox network again, but now he's saying that there are a whole new group of network executives and so they're ensuring him that they won't have that problem again... cross your fingers. anyway, the episodes are set to air in january (so long lost, i need to make room on my dvr), and here's an extra surprise... just found out that another alum from the buffy/angel universe is joining the cast... amy acker from angel (she played fred and illyria... marvelously if i may say so). i also love how joss whedon spreads these actors around, it's nice to see some familiar faces... plus she is also hot, haha.

woo hoo. so here's what joss whedon had to say about his new cast,
"All in all, pound for pound, soup to nuts, man vs beast, it's a pretty amazing ensemble. I'm not sure how I landed this troupe, but rest assured I'm gonna write bestest good word for talkacting to them yes! They're in good hands."

isn't that great? what i like best about his writing is that it's realistic. people don't speak perfectly all day. they make mistakes and use colloquialisms and are dumb sometimes. hey, i think THAT'S actually what i like about his writing so much, he allows people to be dumb. not everything is cut perfectly and people in real life say smart things and say some pretty dumb things too. not like those law & order shows where everyone talks at break-neck speed and everyone's pinpoint accurate with their choice of words, that's so contrived. so i'm hoping that "dollhouse" brings that lighter side to it as well... but i guess we'll have to wait and see...

Monday, September 22, 2008

#177 - get out & stay in

saturday i voted. that's not the important thing, the important thing is that i walked to my polling station. doesn't sound like a lot, but the fact is that i COULD actually walk somewhere in this town and not have to drive. of course, if i didn't have a car then i technically could walk to work and back, but that would be a trek. i'm probably spoiled by nice sidewalks and green things but if i had to walk to work it would be all sun, sweating, and traffic along the way. so it was really great to be able to walk somewhere, feasibly, and with good reason to. like the thing that i love about big cities is that you really can walk places and it's even a preferred mode of transportation. over here you can't get anywhere without a car and that's kinda sad. that means i go from office to home to store to everywhere indoors and rarely get any outdoors time. i was reading a research article the other day that said the more outdoors time people get the better their general mood. makes sense right? sun, chemicals, hormones. so they said that people who just walk for even 30 minutes outside have much better moods that people who sit around the house all day (even if it's all comfy and a/c'ed inside the house). so being able to legitmately go outside and walk somewhere purposefully was a pretty great thing.

plus then after that i went surfing and that was great. sun, beach, ocean, and pretty decent waves at ali'i, super crowded but fun anyway.

that being said however, this week is national stay-at-home week. haha. i guess they said that because all the new shows are (FINALLY!) back on television for the new season. well, terminator was already on a couple weeks ago (as well as mythbusters, man vs. wild, bones) but this week there's the office, 30 rock, and heroes. can't say that i'm really excited about heroes, since last season was a total bust and now that i remember, i didn't think the first season was all that spectacular either. but that's okay because it's on mondays, with terminator, and i LOVE terminator. it's great that they're both on the same night because they're two great examples of what can go right and wrong about a sci-fi tv show:

1. realism - this is the biggest thing, how do you make a show about robots from the future or superheroes real? terminator succeeds, heroes does not. why? writing. i've always been big on writing (as an amateur wannabe tv show critic), probably because i was so spoiled by joss whedon (buffy, angel, firefly, even wrote for rosanne and did the office once too), he was so good at mixing dialogue and situations so that you can't call his shows "comedy" or "horror" or "drama." it's like that with terminator, even though it's mostly action, there's great comedy and everything else in there. heroes tries, but all it's got for humor are those japanese guys, which they use in absolutely predictable situations of "comedic insert." in heroes, the characters play out the plot (not their fault, it was written like a comic book) and even though they try to input political satire, etc. to make it seem contemporary, it's very obviously a storyline. events occur as the episodes dictate. can't really blame them, they're still a tv show, but it's predictable (also, they need to grow an original idea of their own and stop taking powers from the x-men, i admit, i'm an ex-marvel comic geek and they're stealing every single power from the x-men, lame... or at least be less obvious about it). in terminator, each week kinda seems like a mini-movie, events unfold just as they do, the villain doesn't wait for the perfect moment to strike, the terminator acts when it knows what to do, not a second later (of course, it really doesn't because it's a story, but the important thing is that you don't realize that it's a story because of the good writing).

2. writing - gotta say it again because it's important, but y'know those cringe-worthy lines that absolutely give away the fact that you're watching a network tv show? they're all over heroes. terminator gets a leg-up already because there's little dialogue, but the lines they do drop do not derail the storyline, that's what's important. also, all this "coincidental" crap on heroes is retarded. besides, the storyline in heroes is so enormously convoluted. i mean, c'mon, terminator's got robots traveling back in time, humans traveling forward and they manage to keep everything under control. heroes flips time and location and characters and now every new "twist" just shows the writers have gotten too caught up in their own make-believe (kinda like lost, don't y'think?). now i really don't care what happens next on heroes (or lost) because it doesn't matter, you've got to keep the integrity of the storyline and of the characters so that when dramatic events DO happen they're worth happening and viewers actually care about it.

3. characters - do you really actually like any of the characters on heroes? i sure don't, they can all die for all i care. they're either bratty, worthless, skeezy (re: enourmously creepy with milk-curddling british accents), and pretty much all of them are fantastically over-dramatic (kind of like lost, again, haha). but on terminator you get character out the robots for goodness sake. vulnerability and good acting amidst explosions and cyborgs. maybe just that kristen bell girl on heroes, she's pretty. but the rest of them can bite me.

all that being said, i'm still gonna watch heroes... but i will be feverently watching terminator, woo hoo!

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

#176 - screw apple


just when i had finally accepted itunes, gave in a bought an ipod nano just a little while ago, apple gives me another reason to hate itself.

i bought my ipod on july 21st... an 8GB ipod nano for $200.

today, sept. 9th, apple sends me an email telling me they're selling a new ipod nano... a 16GB for $200.

bastards.